As some of the world’s large cities turn themselves around and thrive – just 600 now account for two-thirds of global GDP – countless smaller and medium-sized cities, mainly in Africa, Latin America and Asia, are descending deeper into violence and becoming less liveable, says a leading Latin American urban specialist. In a new paper in Foreign Affairs, Robert Muggah, research director at the Igarapé Institute in Brazil, says anarchy now rules in some places. “North, Central, and South America [are] home to a staggering 45 of the world’s 50 most dangerous metropolises. In some ways, fast-expanding cities such as Acapulco in Mexico, Caracas in Venezuela, Maceió in Brazil, and San Pedro Sula in Honduras are harbingers of what’s to come in the rest of the southern hemisphere.”
The reason some cities spiral into perpetual crisis while others prosper may come down to mayors and city authorities rather than to national governments, he argues. “The city and not the state will determine stability and development in the coming decades. Civic planners in the world’s largest metropolises have learned how to make urban spaces safer and more liveable, allowing cities to recover, thanks to new approaches to policing and social investment,” he says. The first step towards making cities less dangerous and more liveable is improved communication. “In some places, mayors have opened a lively dialogue with vulnerable communities about gang violence and factors that drive it such as extreme income inequality, inadequate service provision, and weak or corrupt police and justice institutions. “This kind of honest dialogue is essential for identifying shared priorities and deploying scarce resources most efficiently. Mayors such as Enrique Peñalosa in Bogotá, Rodrigo Guerrero in Cali, and Antonio Villaraigosa in Los Angeles have all shown that a radical change of approach is possible.”
“Strengthening cities requires greater attention not just to specific spaces, but also to specific groups of people. Young unemployed men with a criminal record are statistically more likely to violate the law than other residents who have not committed crimes. Indeed, only about 0.5% of people generally account for up to 75% of homicidal violence in major cities. But instead of locking up and stigmatising young men, municipal officials should support them. Proven remedies include mediation to interrupt violence between rival gangs, targeted education and recreation projects for at-risk teenagers, and counselling and childcare support for single-parent households.
“The most far-reaching strategy for strengthening fragile cities involves investment in measures to boost social cohesion and mobility. Investments in reliable public transportation, inclusive public spaces, and pro-poor social policies can go a long way toward improving safety,” says Muggah. “There are many examples of how to drive down crime, but Medellín provides the most convincing case of how to do it best. During the 1990s, it was the murder capital of the world. But a succession of mayors beginning with Sergio Fajardo turned things around by focusing their attention on the poorest and most dangerous neighbourhoods. They connected the city’s slums to middle-class areas by a network of cable cars, bus transport systems, and first-class infrastructure. By 2011, homicidal violence declined by about 80%, and in 2012, Medellín was named the city of the year.” He says there are signs that “new technologies can play a decisive role, too”. Information communication technologies are already closing the digital divide between and within urban centres. New smart cities that have begun to take advantage of these tools include Tanzania’s Kigamboni, an administrative ward of the capital, Dar es Salaam, Congo’s Cité du Fleuve, Kenya’s Tatu and Kozo Tech, Ghana’s Hope City and Nigeria’s Eko Atlantic developments. In India, says Muggah, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has announced plans to create 100 smart cities over the next two decades, adding to India’s growing tally of “tech-friendly” urban centres like Ahmedabad, Aurangabad, Khushkhera, Kochi, Manesar, Ponneri and Tumkur. “Investments in hard and soft technologies are fuelling a virtuous cycle by supplying cities with yet more new talent and consolidating their place as hubs of innovation and connectivity.
“To turn fragile cities around, public authorities, businesses, and civic groups must come to grips with the risks that will come with rapid urbanisation but also with the many available solutions. This means starting a conversation about what works and what doesn’t and sharing these findings globally. Successful mayors in developing countries will need to use lessons learned around the world to solve local problems. The more proactive among them are already doing so,” he concludes.
Source: The Guardian, by John Vidal. Source photo: The Guardian, photograph: Alamy.